Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Un-neccesary letters (was: Re: New/revised language: Phonology)

From:Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>
Date:Thursday, December 20, 2001, 20:02
Quoting "Thomas R. Wier" <trwier@...>:

> Quoting Andrew Chaney <adchaney@...>: > > > >> (personally, i've always > > >> felt x was an exceedingly pointless letter but that's just > personal > > bias) > > > > But I dont think this reflects negatively on the letter, I think > > English would a lot less interesting without. Losing x would be > > like taking "gh" out of "knight". > > Because Phaleran has *gained* phonemes, rather than lost them, > since the times of its ancestor, nonphonemic writing is of a > wholly different nature, since you get all sorts of vowels where > vowels no longer exist.
<sigh> I meant to say: "... where vowels might never have existed." (i.e., Sometimes, the vowels that existed in Tlaspi are retained in spelling; other times, when new lexemes come about that don't share the syllable structure of Tlaspi, vowels often have to be inserted for the sake of the orthography.) ===================================================================== Thomas Wier <trwier@...> <http://home.uchicago.edu/~trwier> "...koruphàs hetéras hetére:isi prosápto:n / Dept. of Linguistics mú:tho:n mè: teléein atrapòn mían..." University of Chicago "To join together diverse peaks of thought / 1010 E. 59th Street and not complete one road that has no turn" Chicago, IL 60637 Empedocles, _On Nature_, on speculative thinkers