Re: LUNATIC again

charles wrote:
>
> Nik Taylor wrote:
> >
> > charles wrote:
> > > All languages are codes. What's wrong with that?
> >
> > No, language and code are different things.
>
> Yes, they are different; "language" is a subset
> of "code", not the reverse.
No, I think Nik was saying that a language is not a code. If a language
is not a code, it can't be a subset of code.

> As used here, "code" can often mean "relex".
> In any case I won't quibble further with you.
What is a relex again?