Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: LUNATIC again

From:charles <catty@...>
Date:Wednesday, November 4, 1998, 17:12
Logical Language Group wrote:

> Alas, most conlangs that are not artlangs or fictional languages seem to me > to be "codes". I most often recognize a code by the fact that the lexicon > is presented with single word English definitions. I find it hard to > characterize a conlang like Glosa as anything other than "English with > strange (regularized) grammar and odd-looking codewords". In short, only > one step removed from Pig Latin. I cannot make this statement without it > sounding disparaging - it IS disparaging.
So to be a real AND respectable language, we need an army ... One day the Glosa Nation will make you eat your pig-latin!