Re: Clauses, etc
From: | Jeff Jones <jeffsjones@...> |
Date: | Friday, February 1, 2002, 0:15 |
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002 21:19:08 -0500, Joel <supercooljoel@...> wrote:
> Yes, it is that guy that hides in the depths of the list, I had to change
> my email address unfortunately.
>
>I never really understood fully clauses and that sort of grammar, so in my
>unseeing blindness, i attempted to construct a clause system. Basically,
>you enclose the clause in "nihk...il" if I am trying to say, "The man that
>john hit yesterday is angry" Using that in English is should turn out to be
>"Nihk The man john his yesterday il is angry". You follow? I hope I've got
>the right idea with clauses here.
>
>Any help or criticism is helpful, be reminded, I have NO idea what I'm
>talking about!
>
>- Joel Heikkila
Hi Joel
AFMCL, adding to what others have said:
in MNCL, relative clauses start with the relative pronoun {y-} and end with
a pronoun {d-}, as in:
Zo (man)o ya (John)u (hit)e (yesterday)i da (angry)ize.
"The man [whom] John hit yesterday is angry".
(note: I'm using more or less the English word order (and words) for ease
of reading; MNCL changes the word order within a phrase or phrase order
within a clause according to focus/emphasis and other considerations)
This can be broken down as:
Z-o (man)-o y-a (John)-u (hit)-e (yesterday)-i d-a (angry)-iz-e
DEF-QUAL (V)-QUAL REL-ABS (V)-ERG (V)-PRED (V)-OBL SCT-ABS (V)-PRS-PRED
DEF anaphoric pronoun/determiner (definite article in this case)
REL relative pronoun
SCT subordinate clause terminator
(V) a general vocabulary item
PRS present tense
QUAL this word qualifies what follows directly
ABS absolutive case
ERG ergative case
OBL oblique case; used for adverbial stuff
PRED predicative or essive "case"; the syntactic verb
Does this help?
Jeff