Re: Gnomic aorists (was Re: Góquim)
From: | Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...> |
Date: | Saturday, August 9, 2003, 23:02 |
Quoting Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...>:
> BTW, I wonder whether the Georgian usage is influenced by Greek.
> After all, the standard of Classical Georgian is set by the Bible
> translation.
Not really. Greek ceased to be a direct influence on Georgian
more than a millennium ago.
> > > My Elvish lang uses the uninflected verb for that. Given its most
> > > common function, a traditionalist western philologist would
> > > undoubtedly named it "imperfect".
> >
> > I doubt it. "Imperfect" typically describes on-going actions which
> > in principle have beginnings and ends. Gnomic aorists refer precisely
> > to circumstances which have no beginning or end.
>
> What speaks against renaming it "aorist"? Is it also used as the
> tense of narration (a typical functioon of the aorist)?
That only Andreas can answer.
=========================================================================
Thomas Wier "I find it useful to meet my subjects personally,
Dept. of Linguistics because our secret police don't get it right
University of Chicago half the time." -- octogenarian Sheikh Zayed of
1010 E. 59th Street Abu Dhabi, to a French reporter.
Chicago, IL 60637