Daniel Andreasson wrote:
>Marcus wrote:
>
>> Chickasaw is an active language, and all number verbs take active agreement
>> (Class-I in the Chickasaw literature); contrary to what may be expected
from
>> the semantics.
>
>Where do I read more on that? I know that there is some info about this
>in Pam's article "Syntactic Relations in Western Muskogean", and that
>many quantifiers take a class-I prefix. But is there an explanation
>to this somewhere?
That's about as detailed as I've ever seen in any published material. I
learned of it through the grammar she and Catherine are writing.
Marcus