Re: OT: Parlez vous Kazakh?
From: | BP Jonsson <bpj@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, May 6, 2003, 18:30 |
At 16:25 2.5.2003 +0300, Isaac Penzev wrote:
>Generally speaking, in many Turkic languages there is no phone*m*ic opposition
>/k/~/q/ (I assume, the same picture was in Proto-Turkic). One phoneme /k/ was
>realized as [q] in words with back vowels and as [k] (or even [k_j]) in the
>words with front vowels:
>
>Balkar /kol/ [qol] "hand" ~ /köl/ [k_j2l_j] "lake".
Also this was exploited when writing Turkic languages with Arabic script:
_qaaf_, _ghayn_ and the "emphatic" dental letters were used in back-vowel words
while _kaaf_, _gaaf_ and the plain dentals were used in front-vowel words.
Apparently this goes way back to how Uighur was written in Aramaic/Sogdian
script.
/ B.Philip Jonsson B^)
--
mailto:melrochX@melroch.net (delete X!)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No man forgets his original trade: the rights of
nations and of kings sink into questions of grammar,
if grammarians discuss them.
-Dr. Samuel Johnson (1707 - 1784)
Reply