Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: USAGE: OE pt was Re: USAGE:Yet another few questions about Welsh.

From:Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Sunday, July 11, 2004, 18:15
On Saturday, July 10, 2004, at 10:50 , David Barrow wrote:

> Even though 'Alfred' is a compound: Ælf- ræd? Was this voicing a > regular feature of OE? Did it happen to /s/ and /T/ as well?
Yes to both questions. As far we know, the fricatives were voiced between voiced sounds,
> David Barrow > > Ray Brown wrote: > >> >> Now, when the Normans took over and reformed (or deformed) our spelling, >> you do find names like Alfred being written as Alvred (yes, the |f| was >> voiced here in OE). The only trouble is that it wasn't till centuries >> later that 'u' and 'v' were distinguished as separate letters. So the >> poor old Alfred was likely to get his name misread as 'Alured'.
=============================================================== On Sunday, July 11, 2004, at 02:26 , David Barrow wrote:
> Joe wrote:
[snip]
>> Well, it still happens to /T/. But, yes, /s/ too. > > It happens with plurals after 'th' baths, mouths, paths (though not in > everybody's accent), with verbs.
That's because these forms have come down to us from OE via Middle English.
> But in 'paTHless', 'paTHmark', > ruTHless, claSSroom, staFFroom?
These are modern compounds. The difference is important. In OE the voiced & unvoiced fricatives were allophones conditioned by their environment. In modern English /f/ and /v/ are separate phonemes, likewise /T/ and /D/, and /s/ and /z/. Except in the traditional, now irregular, forms (i.e. plurals and verbs) we no longer have these environmentally conditioned allophones, so when we add the two morphemes /paT/ + /lEs/ there is no in modern English to trigger the voicing of /pat/. BTW I wrote /paT/ because its the normal pronunciation in much of Britain and seems a suitable compromise between the /pAT/ of RP of south-east England and /p&T/ of America :)
> My question is about voicing of /f/, > /s/ /T/ in OE when there's compounding: 'forþbrengan', 'eorþbyrig', > 'lufrædan' and whether it was regular.
It was, and the voicing would be regular for the reasons I've given. Ray =============================================== http://home.freeuk.com/ray.brown ray.brown@freeuk.com (home) raymond.brown@kingston-college.ac.uk (work) =============================================== "A mind which thinks at its own expense will always interfere with language." J.G. Hamann, 1760

Reply

David Barrow <davidab@...>