From: | Tristan McLeay <kesuari@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Thursday, May 8, 2003, 11:33 |
John Cowan wrote:>Tristan McLeay scripsit: > > > >>Hm, well if one-l lamas are pronounced with a /l/, and two-l llamas are >>pronounced with a /j/, what're three-l lllamas? /lja:m@/? :) >> >> > >It's more usual to pronounce both "lama" and "llama" in English with /l/. >I know, but it isn't as fun that way.>Nash points out in a footnote that a "three-l lllama" is a fire to which >three firetrucks respond (a "three-alarmer"). > >Ah, someone else who can talk properly :P -- Tristan <kesuari@...>
John Cowan <cowan@...> |