Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Country names

From:David Barrow <davidab@...>
Date:Tuesday, May 13, 2003, 19:44
Joe wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David Barrow" <davidab@...> > To: <CONLANG@...> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 7:40 PM > Subject: Re: Country names > > > Joe wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "David Barrow" <davidab@...> > > > To: <CONLANG@...> > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 7:48 AM > > > Subject: Re: Country names > > > > > > > Joe wrote: > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Carlos Thompson" <chlewey@...> > > > > > To: <CONLANG@...> > > > > > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 10:32 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: Country names > > > > > > > > > > > Tristan McLeay wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Robert B Wilson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>We here say /@stSr\&iL@/ where /L/=[j], [lj] or [li]. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >you say 'istrailyih'? :P > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No, everyone else can't say Australia properly, and it has a > very > > > > > > > obvious pronunciation from its spelling :P > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course: [aws"t4alja]. Obvious, not? > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, in my Ideolectical Chibchombian English it would become > > > > > > [Os`"t`r`ejlj@], or something like that. Aussie/Ozzie would be > > > ["OzI]. > > > > > > > > > > > > (not sure if that [t`r`] is actually a slightly palatized > retroflex > > > trill) > > > > > > > > > > > > Of course, I am not a native English Speaker. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Carlos Th > > > > > > > > > > In RP it would be about the same as you pronounce it, but without > the > > > > > retroflexes. [Ostrejlij@] > > > > > > > > [Qstreili@] with au as the o in lost not as the au in cause say all my > > > > dictionaries > > > > > > > > > > > > David Barrow > > > > > > > > > > I'm afraid I can't tell any difference between the two, when short. > > > > Do you pronounce the vowels in caught and court or cause* and course the > > same? Aside from whether you accent is rhotic or not. > > > > or the vowels in cot and caught or coss and cause the same? > > > > Note, I said 'when short' I pronounce 'caught'[kO:t] and cot[cOt], as far > as I can tell.
I see, your cot is [kOt] and not [kQt] (which would be the RP form), right? RP has [O:] in caught [Q] in cot ,and [O] as the first element of the "oi"/ "oy" diphthong. David Barrow

Reply

Joe <joe@...>