Re: OT-ish:Conlang Census

En réponse à Andreas Johansson :


>We've got the most blond(e)s, so we get to define it!
I disagree on that. Since you've got mostly blond(e)s, you lack the 
comparative knowledge that would allow you to define what "blond" means. 
The result is that you apply "blond" only for what is a subset of the 
correct "blond". We, on the other hand, have all the palette of hair 
colours you can imagine, and as such are better at defining them.

Christophe Grandsire.

http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr

You need a straight mind to invent a twisted conlang. 

Reply