Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Where does inflection change to agglutination?

From:Christophe Grandsire <christophe.grandsire@...>
Date:Friday, December 27, 2002, 20:12
En réponse à Roberto Suarez Soto <ask4it@...>:

> On Dec/26/2002, Danny Wier wrote: > > > Well you're on the right track. Remember that Proto-Indo-European > became > > inflected after various alternations of an originally agglutinative > form. > > I didn't know that. Curious :-) >
Why? Language evolution is quite logically cyclic. Take a language at an isolating stage, where all words, even function words, are more or less independent. With time, the function words lose stress and independence, and become bound to the content words. Still, the separation between the content word (becoming a root) and the function words (becoming affixes) is clear. That's the agglutinative stage. Now with time, sound changes blur the frontier between the root and the affix and blend affixes together, so that we loose the equation "one morpheme=one meaning". That's the inflecting stage. Now as time goes on, sound changes carry on eroding the word and the affixes slowly disappear, while the language evolves new full words to take over the functions that the affixes cannot assume any more. After a while, you're back at an isolating stage and the cycle can begin again.
> > Semitic languages are more inflectional, particularly in all those > verb > > forms; they change vowel configurations. But even those has > agglutinative > > Have these changes any fixed rules? I guess so, just wondering > aloud :-) Any examples? >
Actually, Semitic conjugations don't "change" vowel configurations: they "choose" those configurations instead. You have to remember that in Semitic languages, only the consonants of a root (usually three) carry the semantic information (sometimes with the help of one vowel) and the vowels are chosen depending on the function of the word. But apart from that, yes, the vowel configurations have rules, although the presence of irregularities make the picture somewhat blurred. But for instance, for triliteral roots (roots made of three consonants) in Arabic, the vowel configuration a-a-a (meaning a [a] after each consonant) normally means: 3rd person singular masculine of the past tense (which happens to be also the citation form of verbs in Arabic). Christophe. http://rainbow.conlang.free.fr Take your life as a movie: do not let anybody else play the leading role.

Reply

Thomas R. Wier <trwier@...>