Re: Degrees of volition in active languages (was Re: Chevraqis: asketch)
| From: | Vasiliy Chernov <bc_@...> | 
|---|
| Date: | Monday, August 14, 2000, 18:28 | 
|---|
On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 07:04:00 -0400, The Gray Wizard <dbell@...>
wrote:
>amman iar uses word order for pragmatic distinctions, giving preference to
>TFV (topic, focus, verb) order.
I've just noticed that T&F belong to a different set than V.
Do you never treat verbs as T or F? Do you use any transformation when
a V is a T or a F, pragmatically? Could not find the answer on your
site, at a glance.
(Also, "TFV" sounds a bit weird to me as a speaker of a natlang with
word order mostly determined by the pragmatic factors.)
>> > Nur-ellen certainly looks interesting.  Do you have a website?
>>
>> Unfortunately not yet.  I am still working on it, but I am going to set
>> up a page about Nur-ellen soon.
>
>Well, work a little harder!  Can't you see there are those of us anxious
to
>learn more about this interesting language? ;-)
I second this !  :)
Basilius