Re: OT: Notice of Revocation of Independence

Mark J. Reed wrote:

>Paul> Not only had I actually seen it before, it was originally circulated back
>Paul> when there actually *was* a reasonable doubt over who had been elected --
>
>Now, now, it didn't say that there was any doubt over the result.  It
>said that we failed to make the correct decision.  That is, of course,
>an opinion shared by slightly less than half of the US population, or at
>least the voting ones.
>
>
Lol... I have an american friend who would dispute that. Not that I'm
saying he's right, but all the comments the head of the company
manufacturing the Diebold voting machines made along with all the dodgy
tallies in areas where the machines were used really didn't help....
*sigh* My friend keeps saying "I'm not a citizen of America anymore! I'm
just a citizen of california!".