Brithenig (was Re: Ebb and flow (was Re: Naisek Pages Updated))
From: | Jörg Rhiemeier <joerg_rhiemeier@...> |
Date: | Thursday, August 7, 2008, 18:52 |
Hallo!
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 20:42:10 +1200, andrew wrote:
> [re changing Brithenig or not]
>
> Best to leave it as is. I think if I did get around to working on an
> alternative Brythonic conlang I should have a go at doing an a priori
> language. Could be interesting to try. (Although Sindarin already
> exists! :) At my current rate of conlanging this should take place
> sometime around about when we achieve technological singularity.
>
> Grammatically I consider Brithenig a closed canon. Lexically I'm still
> researching words and phrases for translation exercises.
Yes. Brithenig is a classic, and apart from researching new words,
it ought to be kept the way it is. Any substantial change to its
phonology or grammar would cause a major upheaval with the Ill
Bethisad community and is not worth the trouble.
A friend of a friend of mine once said, "Art is when someone says
'Now'." There is a point in most works of art when the artist
declares it finished and refrains from further additions. Art
always means to choose what to do and what NOT to do.
... brought to you by the Weeping Elf