From: | Lars Henrik Mathiesen <thorinn@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Tuesday, November 7, 2000, 23:35 |
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 19:20:50 +0100 > From: Mikael Johansson <mikael.johansson@...>> A quick peer into Lewis&Scott (online @ > http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/lexica.html and click the link ;-) > yields that in fact amans is only operable as a present participle.You must be using a parallel-world version of Perseus. Here's the complete entry from Lewis and Short *here*: amans, P. a. and subst., v. amo. So, again, what's the ablative of amans as a noun? Luckily, Perseus also includes Allen and Greenough, who speak directly to the point: