Re: How to Make Chicken Cacciatore (was: phonetics by guesswork)
From: | Mark J. Reed <markjreed@...> |
Date: | Sunday, July 25, 2004, 0:16 |
TM> Well, whether a distinction is easy to hear or not depends on your
TM> experiences.
JMW> If by 'experiences' you mean 'languages you know', then I fully agree.
TM> I find [e] and [I] pretty obvious, but [I] and [i] is beyond me...
That surprises me coming from an English - or at least Down-Underish -
speaker. I suppose in your 'lect the distinction between "bit" and
"beat" is solely one of length?
JMW> :) To me, [I] and [i] is pretty obvious, whereas the difference between [I]
JMW> and a French or German /e/ is beyond me.
Well, "the difference between [I] and /e/" is not a meaningful phrase;
[I] could very well be the realization of /e/ in some 'lect of French or
German. You're mixing apples and oranges. :)
If you mean the difference between [I] and [e], then I think that's
strange; it seems like a much clearer distinction than [I]/[i] or
[E]/[e] or even [I]/[E]. If you meant the latter, then I can
understand the confusion more readily.
JMW> Of course, the sign of [e] could
JMW> rather represent the vowel of English <pet> (which I perceive clearly
JMW> different from [I] and from [E])
In my 'lect of English (and in 'Murkin generally, though of course
not all 'Murkin dialects), the vowel of |pet| is exactly [E]. I think
that is true of RP as well. So I'm confused - in what variety of
English is the vowel of |pet| clearly different from [E]? I thought
most Englishes had [E]. They might be missing [e], realizing /e/ as
[E:] or [Ej], rather than (as in my 'lect) [ej], but I hadn't heard of
an [E]-less English.
> The babies' ability to distinguish doesn't surprise me much. What surprises
> me is the speakers inability to distinguish. I suppose that the same tests
> as with the babies were made with grown up speakers, too?
Oh, yes, quite conclusively. For instance, in a study of well-educated,
well-prepared and well-practiced Japanese adults, the vast, vast
majority, in the vicinity of 99% IIRC, could not hear the change when a
speaker slowly and carefully went from saying [la la la la] to saying
[r\a r\a r\a r\a].
_Marcos
Replies