Re: Not phonetic but ___???
From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
Date: | Saturday, April 17, 2004, 15:07 |
And Rosta scripsit:
> as for /ju/, it would be counterproductive to treat it as a diphthong,
> since its behaviour is so much to the contrary.
Indeed, it would be plausible, if SPE-ish, to treat it as underlying /y/,
realized by breaking.
--
Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus. Deshil Holles eamus.
Send us, bright one, light one, Horhorn, quickening, and wombfruit. (3x)
Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa! Hoopsa, boyaboy, hoopsa!
-- Joyce, Ulysses, "Oxen of the Sun" jcowan@reutershealth.com
Reply