Re: A phonology
| From: | Stone Gordonssen <stonegordonssen@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Saturday, July 26, 2003, 15:52 |
|---|
> > Still, mightn't there be a tendency to reanalyze a word like up.a >
>u.pa??
>
>FWIW, no such language exists TMK.
Intersting. I made this a rather common feature for the suffixes, in my
conlang Nenshar, which designate state.
dap [dap] = stone
dapi ["dap.i] = stone in motion
shu [Su] = hand
dapir shusa ["dap.Ir "Sus.a] = stone-in-motion-ready hand-my-active = I drop
the stome
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus