Re: About Romance natlangs and conlangs (Re: ) (LONG)
From: | Gustavo Eulalio <guga@...> |
Date: | Friday, November 19, 1999, 14:20 |
On: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 18:34:54 -0500
Nik Taylor wrote:
=3d---------=3d---------=3d---------=3d---------=3d
> > In Portuguese, AFAIK, it is the analytic compound
> > form which is still used (or is there also a synthetic form?)
>
> In Portuguese, one can put the object pronoun between the infinitive and
> the ending, e.g.:
>
> Ver-me-a =3d (s)he/you will see me, but it's also common to avoid that,
> but I don't remember how.
Ver-me-=e1
Me ver=e1 (in Brazil it's very common, although it's considered
wrong by the grammar)
Vai me ver
Ir=e1 me ver
Every verb in the future tense can be said as "vai + verb" (vai
=3d to go [present]), or "ir=e1 + verb" (ir=e1 =3d to go [future]).
In the conditional (preterite of future) it can be "iria + ver"
(iria =3d to go [conditional]), or "ia + verb" (ia=3d to go [past imperf.])=
.
I think the latter is used only in Brazil, though I'm not sure, and is
also wrong, by the grammar.
--
~~~~~~~~ Gustavo Eulalio ~~~~~~~~~ guga@guganet.8m.com ~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~ "O Pateta usa teclado. O Mickey Mouse", an=f4nimo ~~~~~~~
/"\
\ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML
X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \