Aspects vs. Tenses in an All-Out Grudge Match! (was Artyom Kouzminykh; Answes&proposal)
From: | Steg Belsky <draqonfayir@...> |
Date: | Friday, August 20, 1999, 21:34 |
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:11:51 -0700 Barry Garcia
<Barry_Garcia@...> writes:
>They are? Hmm tell that to the Austronesians who dont even have tense
>in
>their verbs, which only show aspect. To show time, we use adverbs of
>time,
>like tomorrow, today, now, yesterday, etc. Verbs conjugate according
>to
>aspect: finished, continuing, and contemplated.
I seem to remember reading that some people theorize that Proto-Semitic
only had aspects, and not tenses. I never really understood what exactly
the difference is....if an action is in the past, isn't it finished? And
present actions are continuing, and future actions are only
contemplated...
-Stephen (Steg)
"hhalomot zeh b'emet"
___________________________________________________________________
Get the Internet just the way you want it.
Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month!
Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.