Re: Question about Neo-Dalmatian

On Sun, 8 Sep 2002, [iso-8859-1] Jan van Steenbergen wrote:

> > So is this, or shall I say, so *was* this. Everything to do with this
> > language has been destroyed, or so I thought. Julius Liptak was a pen name
> > of mine; Laci Kovacs was a friend of mine whose computer I was using at
> > the time. [...] The geocities link you mentioned (/parhtenon/6502) is the
> > only thing you'll find on the old one anymore besides the numbers.
>
> Are you aware of the fact that a lot of links point in that direction? A lot
> more than to the newer one, it seems...
I wasn't aware of this. So I would now ask anyone who has a link to that
site, please change it to the new one: http://www.geocities.com/dalmatesku

>
> > The old one was a failed reconstruction, failed because of insuffiecient
> > data, and I abandoned it. A few years later I began the new one, as a
> > (more) purely constructed language.
>
> Is the name "Neo-Dalmatian" still valid? Or is it currently just "Dalmatian" or
> "Dalmatesku"?
You know, I was thinking about that not long before you sent the first
message, and I don't know. Generally I call it Dalmatian or Dalmatesku,
unless the distinction must be made between the conlang and the natlang.

---ferko