Re: CHAT: Nov 11th
| From: | Bryan Maloney <bjm10@...> |
|---|
| Date: | Tuesday, November 16, 1999, 18:19 |
|---|
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, abrigon wrote:
> (400+-) were totally detroyed. Maybe a good reason for a common lingo,
> AuxLang is so people can talk to each other and make sure WW1s and like
> never happen again.
Rubbish.
Trash.
Nonsense.
Crapola.
The belligerents in the French Revolution spoke a common language. The
belligerents in the English and American Civil Wars spoke a common
language. The belligerents in the American Revolution (not counting a
handful of Hessians) spoke a common language. Gang-bangers who shoot
holes into each other usually speak a common language. The leaders of
the Wars of the Roses spoke a common language.
The idea that a universal Auxlang will lead in any way to world piece is
unsubstantiable twaddle. Indeed, it is actually contradicted by the
witness of history. A shared language is no guarantor of, nor even an
impetus towards, peace.