Re: Tentative Judajca =A= Conjugations
From: | Eric Christopherson <rakko@...> |
Date: | Monday, March 26, 2001, 0:38 |
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 12:37:58PM +0000, Raymond Brown wrote:
> I don't see any circumflexes - but what I do see is not, I think, what I'm
> meant to see; e.g. surely the second symbol in Jdajc and t is not really
> meant to be a smal superscript square!
Raymond, I saw all of his special characters displayed in the proper way,
but in your post on the other hand everything you quoted from him was
strange. Some of the characters came out as odd characters, many of them as
sequences of backslash+3 digits. *sigh* This was all working before I
decided to update my terminfo stuff...
--
Eric Christopherson / *Aiworegs Ghristobhorosyo