Re: CHAT: General Question
From: | Shreyas Sampat <nsampat@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, March 28, 2001, 20:43 |
(snip dirk's helpful comments)
Conveniently, it doesn't have voiceless stops. So, there won't be cases of
vowel+voiceless stop being mistaken for vowel+rest+voiced stop, or
something. In fact, formally there are no phonemic stops. All fricatives,
nasals, liquids and the like. It's wildly implausible, but I do have sort
of an excuse: it's an exercise in seeing if it would work, with no intention
at all to be naturalistic.
YHL observed that this rest would be very prone to assimilation and the
like; upon pondering, I have to agree. The project's got two distinct
rests, one of which, the 'short rest', apparently usually turns into a
glottal stop between vowels, or next to a consonant turns the consonant into
a stop or lengthens the adjacent vowel. The 'long rest' aspirates
consonants and turns vowels into voiced-devoiced dipthongs.
soo, I can illustrate the sound changes like so: (where _ is the short rest
and __ the long rest)
V_V -> V?V
V_C -> V:C
C_V -> C(homorganic stop)V
C_C-> C(homorganic stop)C
V1__V2 -> V1V1<o>V2
V__C -> VV<o>C
C__V -> C<h>V
C__C -> C<h>C
There we are. That wasn't too painful.
--
Shreyas