| From: | John Cowan <cowan@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sunday, June 13, 1999, 0:30 |
Charles scripsit:> Is it? I'd like half an excuse to revert to a totally 100% isolating > syntax without any morphology. AFAIK, English and Chinese are furthest > out on that limb. Even creoles have some morphology.And Chinese has more (inflectional) morphology than English, yada yada... -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org e'osai ko sarji la lojban.