Re: Animacy of nouns
From: | Dirk Elzinga <dirk.elzinga@...> |
Date: | Saturday, September 10, 2005, 13:48 |
On 9/10/05, David J. Peterson <dedalvs@...> wrote:
> Carsten wrote:
> <<
> My question is how do you know how animate a
> noun is compared to another one? Are there rules (maybe only
> rules of thumb), or is this completely up to the speaker, or
> are there groups of "objects with high animateness",
> "objects with an average animacy", "objects with a low
> animacy", "inanimate objects", i.e. some kind of noun
> classes for this?
> >>
>
> First, this is language-specific. So, for example, first person
> tends to be more animate than second person, but there's a
> rather famous native American language (I just can't remember
> the name) where second person is more animate than first.
I believe it is a Yuman language (Maricopa, Yavapai, Walapai, Mojave,
etc). I liked this feature, so I included it in Miapimoquitch.
Dirk
--
Gmail Warning: Watch the reply-to!