Re: measuring systems (was: Selenites)
From: | J.A. Mills <xenolingua@...> |
Date: | Thursday, October 1, 1998, 8:44 |
In a message dated 9/30/98 10:55:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time, fortytwo@UFL.EDU
writes:
<< Anyways, such a change would fundamentally alter the economy. Changing
the work day from 1/3 of the day to 1/4 of the day would reduce the
hours worked by 25%. Unless wages were increased by 33%, people would
no longer make as much money. Hey, I'm all for a 6 or 7 hour day. And
maybe we'll get one, one day, but only by changes in the economy, and in
people's wants. Not by changing the day itself. I still stand by the
idea that time-measurements benefits from being easily divided into
sections. The day can be easily divided into 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, or 24
sections without fractions. One-fifth also isn't difficult - 4 hours,
48 minutes.
>>
We need a historical economist to see if your theory that the work-day cannot
be shortened bears out. However, my grandfather used to tell stories of a 12
hour work-day. Also, kindly allow me to point out _several_ countries that
limit the number of hours worked per week, offer mega-vacations, and stipulate
overtime pay scales (Um, Germany anyone? How about a little Sweden?)
Admittedly, crushing taxes accompany this. In any case, today's work-day is
shorter; who knows about tomorrow's?