Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Biwa (was: YAC: ...)

From:Carlos Eugenio Thompson Pinzón <chlewey@...>
Date:Tuesday, October 31, 2000, 21:32
Jessi Stefen Bangs wabbe:

> > but those vowels had different evolution: > > i -> 1 i: -> i: -> i > > y -> y y: -> 2:H -> 9Y > > e -> E e: -> e: -> e > > 2 -> 9 2: -> @\: -> @ > > a -> V a: -> A: -> A > > o -> O o: -> o:w -> ow > > u -> U u: -> }: -> } > >Is there any pattern to this at all? Generally, vowels tend >to move en masse, either all raising, all lowering, all long >vowels diphthongize, etc., or only one at a time. Taking >examples from English, the Great Vowel Shift raised and >dipthongized all long stressed vowels, but afterwards an >isolated phonetic change (in my dialect) changed [au] to [&u]. > >So, did the vowels here ever have a distinct shift? Or are >all the changes random?
Well, probably a combination of mass changing and isolated changes. Previous pattern could suggest that all short vowels became a little laxer, while long vowels would remind tense. Then some long vowels would have diphthongised. The pattern could have been: i -> I -> 1 i: -> i: -> i 2 -> Y -> y 2: -> 2: -> 2:H -> 9Y e -> E e: -> e: -> e 3 -> 9 3: -> 3: -> @ a -> @ -> V a: -> a: -> A: -> A o -> O o: -> o: -> o:w -> ow } -> U }: -> }: -> } Well. I know the product: Modern Biwa. I'm just trying to figure out Old Biwa, and these are just theories. Another theory could suggest: i -> I / ij I -> 1, ij -> i y -> Y / 2H 2H -> 9Y e -> E / ej ej -> e 2 -> 9 / ew ew -> @ a -> a / A@, a -> V, A@ -> A o -> O / ow u -> U / }w }w -> } where the first change where a split between close and open syllables, then most diphthongs were lost and would never have been a long stage. -- Carlos Th _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.