Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: MeloChalaka

From:Sally Caves <scaves@...>
Date:Sunday, September 23, 2001, 16:01
Wow, I love it, Heather!  This is quite a nice little
conlang, "klu klu" being one of my favorite words
of yours.  Your accentual and rhythmic rules are
fascinating, and I also like your afferent, efferent, infferent
and exfferent voices.  Original.  Welcome to the list.
I've been conlanging for about thirty years,  and had
far less exposure when I was a teenager to linguistics
than you have.  So you're on the right track here!
Mellifluous name for a conlang, too.

Sally Caves
scaves@frontiernet.net
http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/teonaht.html
http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/whatsteo.html
http://www.frontiernet.net/~scaves/teoreal.html

Niffodyr tweluenrem lis teuim himo an
"Even the gods have retractible claws."
                                    The Gospel of Bast

----- Original Message -----
From: Heather Rice <florarroz@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:30 AM
Subject: MeloChalaka


> Finally! I'm here now. Here is that clip of a poem in MeloChalaka I > said I would post. I included the translation with it. > > G`rüshk klú klú Bluebird chuckles(verb) > Tád'á vív Woodpecker buzzes(verb) > Gád yágló Bluejay warbles(verb) > Wádwí tyí Bobwhite whistles(verb) > > Â fá vâl lí fâl And more beautiful than all > Ylí D'râç Breath of-forrest > Sñétwín â sñéchlâyn C-E-tweet-3p. and C-E-sing-3p > Chíláyí çånå ón Song haunt his (possesive pronoun) > > Â ¡ú'ínë! And look! (no morphology, just
some word that
> sounds right) > Vûltsú sîyå Sky W-I-Hm-brighten > Syér sîshlå Cloud W-I-Hm-tearapart > > Sfí -dgó Com-NP-I do(verb) > Sfí d'yåy'l mgó Com-NP-I day make(verb) > Sfí móg gwló Com-NP-I work(noun) finish(verb) > Sfí ké'ú -dgó Com-NP-I painter do(verb) > > C = Cyclical aspect > E = Efferent, i.e. the action is going out from subject > 3p = third person > W = Waxing aspect, i.e. its getting more and more > I = Infferent, i.e. all the action is occuring within the subject > Hm = Happy mood, the person who says this is happy about it. > Com = completed aspect > NP = proximal past, the action has just happened. > > Now, there are two things in this language about which I am very proud, > the accent, or metrical system and the voices. > > The accent system is built for poetry. It is very simple, but can be > used very effectively. There are three rules. > 1. The accent always falls on the first syllable. > 2. A word cannot consist of more than three syllables. NO EXCEPTIONS. > 3. Every word in an utterance gets the same amount of time. So, > whether it has one, two or three syllables, each gets the same abount > of time, like a beat for music. > > The third rule makes all the fun. Note in the first stanza the order > of syllable is 1-2, 2-1, 1-2, 2-1. Try saying the first stanza and > beating the time with your hands. > > I think it would also be fun to experiment with pauses, vowel > harmonization and putting all this to real music. > > The second thing I am proud of is the voices. There are four, > Afferent, Efferent, Infferent and Exfferent. Efferent is like an > Active voice. Afferent is like a Passive voice. Infferent means all > the action is occuring WITHIN the person, Reflexive, sort of. "My > heart beats" would be infferent, but "I beat myself" would be afferent. > Exfferent means all the action is occuring outside the speaker, the > speaker is merely the observer. So, you can keep the person the same, > but change the voice, or keep the voice the same and change the person. > > I thought this was a great language, but the speakers took one look at > it and threw it back at me. They said it was to impractical for daily > use, what with the metrical system and all. They did grudginly agree > that they would use it for poetry, but told me to go invent another > language for daily use. So, I'm back at inventing a new one again. > > chao, > > Heather >