Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Wikipedia: Conlang articles in danger

From:Benct Philip Jonsson <bpj@...>
Date:Tuesday, July 26, 2005, 12:21
And Rosta skrev:
> Jan: > >> I might as well give you the full list of articles currently under >> attack: >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Aingelj%C3%A3> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Breathanach> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Brithenig> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/DiLingo> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Fyksland> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Verdurian >> language> >> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Wenedyk> > > > I read the Brithenig discussion, & the arrogance & ignorance of some of the > pro-deletion contributors made me so angry that it made me want to wash > my hands of the wikipedia project (in the sense of it receiving my > goodwill & wholly passive support), if the structure of the project is > such that articles can be vulnerable to the intervention of people like > these. One of the joys of the internet is that it is free from the > deadening effects of adherence to cultural norms, received wisdoms, > orthodoxies and so forth. > I had supposed that wikipedia was constructed in a similar spirit, but > with the added element of the public volunteering their expertise for > the project, so as to ensure that the content of articles is correct, > true and fair. But if the project is supposed to also be an arbiter of > what is 'important' -- well, I considered that to the job of the > wikipedia *user*; I want the decision about what is important to be > made by me, when choosing which articles to read, not made by the > prejudices of particular wikipedia activists, nor even by the aggregated > prejudices of the rest of society. > > To sum up, the very fact that wikipedia can entertain the sort of crap > spouted by the deletionists makes me think that the wikipedia project > is bled of much of its value, and hence that battles over the inclusion > of this or that conlang are not worth fighting. > > --And. > >
I hope you have made/will make these thoughts known to the wikipedianists! -- /BP 8^)> -- Benct Philip Jonsson -- melroch at melroch dot se Solitudinem faciunt pacem appellant! (Tacitus)

Reply

And Rosta <a.rosta@...>