From: | Joe <joe@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Tuesday, June 13, 2006, 10:18 |
Benct Philip Jonsson wrote:> I once read a book aimed at enabling students to > make *very* narrow transcriptions of English speech. > It claimed that the actual phonetic realization of > '/tSr/' where it occurs is [t`s`] -- not unreasonably > if the realization of /r/ is retroflex, which it > apparently is in most accents in both the US and > the UK.I'd say they're both retroflex, but the US accents are generally further back than the English ones.