Re: CHAT: Californian secessionists (was Re: Californian vowels [was Re: Likin

And I can't believe that there is any way any part of California, North,
Cetral, South, East, West, polkadot-hopscotch, could be among the poorest
anythings in the US.  Are you forgetting that the US still includes West
Virginia, Arkansas, and other really ecconomically disadvantaged areas?

And as for Southern Cal holding its positio without the aid of North and
Central Cal. . . I don't buy it.  But what has this got to do with
conlanging??

Adam

So lift the cup of joy and take a big drink.
In spite of it all it's a beautiful world.
-------Suzanne Knutzen




>From: Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@...>
>Reply-To: Constructed Languages List <CONLANG@...>
>To: CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU
>Subject: Re: CHAT: Californian secessionists (was Re: Californian vowels
>           [was Re: Likin
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:31:34 -0700
>
>CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU writes:
> > and both Central and Northern would
> >quickly become two of the poorest.  Also, what on Earth would happen to
> >the
> >UC system?
>
>I hate presumptions, and until David can prove that So Cal would be the
>richest, i'd like to point out in defense of the two red headed step
>children of the state (Nor and Central Cal):
>
>Oh really? That explains why the most lucrative agricultural areas in the
>state are both located in central and northern California. LA has
>entertainment. Northern has Silicon Valley and Ag. Central CA has
>agriculture:
>
>For my county alone (Monterey), the crop summary for the state in 1999 was:
>
>$2,441,832,450
>
>so.....like.......nyah!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________________
>
>Some of us tow the line
>Some of us are out of reach
>Everybody party time
>Some of us, will never sleep again...
>                                                                 - Gorillaz

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Reply