From: | <morphemeaddict@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Saturday, February 2, 2008, 7:22 |
In a message dated 2/1/2008 12:29:59 PM Central Standard Time, mizunomi@GMAIL.COM writes:> Given this, do research languages even *deserve* their own > term?Of course they deserve their own term. But "research language" is one such term. It doesn't need to be shortened to something like "xxxlang" to be useful. How about "mini-language"? stevo </HTML>