Re: What to Call Non-Conlangers
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 3, 2005, 21:40 |
Sally Caves wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe" <joe@...>
>
>> Sally Caves wrote:
>>
>>> Ah, but that's so dull! We're all of us natlangers, too. None of us
>>> DON'T
>>> speak a natural language. The point was to put us in a special
>>> category,
>>
> (self-correction... that should be "DOESN'T)
Should it? That seems strange to me. I think you were right the first time.
I was just playing with the Natlang-Conlang distinction. Since a
Natlang is the opposite of a Conlang, a Natlanger should be the opposite
of a Conlanger. I wasn't being scientific, just facetious.
Replies