Re: Cyninglic (was: RE: Runes (was: Re: RV: Old English))

Dan (Dan):
> And wrote:
> > Vasili Gsrernov (Basileus):
> > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:11:00 +0100, hæfþ yl-ruil <yl-ruil@...>
> > > gewriten:
> > >
> > > >Se cyning (Basileus) haþ writen
> > >
> > > Se Cyninglic (Basilius), probably... or Þéodenlic ;)
> >
> > What would modern English reflexes of _Cyninglic_ and _Þéodenlic_
> > be? Is _king_ regularly from _cyning_, so _Kingly_ (boringly), or
> > might we instead have something like _Kinningly_?
>
> If king was very rarely used, yes. But king from cyninglic is by haplology.
Isn't _kingly_ from _cyninglic_ and _king_ from _cyning_? At any rate, if
the haplology is irregular, as haplology generally is, then the *name*
_Cyninglic_ might be exempt, in which case we might render _Vasily/Basileus_
as _Kinningly_. No?

--And.