Re: The English/French counting system (WAS: number systems fromconlangs)
From: | Joe <joe@...> |
Date: | Tuesday, September 16, 2003, 5:43 |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nik Taylor" <yonjuuni@...>
To: <CONLANG@...>
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: The English/French counting system (WAS: number systems
fromconlangs)
> "Mark J. Reed" wrote:
> > I mean, as long as my boss and I agree on what time I'm supposed to
> > show up for a meeting (which is admittedly an open question if it's
> > at half [past] the hour :) ), does it really matter if we call it
> > 2:30 PM EDT, 1330 EST, or 1830 UTC? Who cares if the sun is at
> > high noon at 0600 in the summer and 0700 in the winter instead of
> > at 1200 year round? Clock time is just an arbitrary label and it's
> > past time we got rid of its archaic chaining to the position
> > of the sun in the local sky.
>
> Now, that's a bit much, in my opinion. :-) Daylight savings is silly,
> I agree, but time zones, in one form or another, are essential. I
> suppose you could have the same "time" everywhere, but that would be
> even more inconvenient than time zones. For example, in some places,
> normal working hours would be 9-17, in others they'd be 4-12, in still
> others they'd be 20-04, so that halfway thru your day you have to change
> the date! As long as people live on the surface of the Earth, they're
> going to be awake at different times in different parts. :-)
>
> Tho, I have a similar view about the calendar. Get rid of leap years,
> and just have a 365-day year every year, and don't worry about the slow
> procession of the seasons.
Shall I tell you my idea for calender reform?
You have 13 months, of 28 days each. Every 28 years, you have a leap-month,
and every 112 years you have two. There.
Reply