Re: DISC: phonological system of Adain
From: | Dirk Elzinga <dirk_elzinga@...> |
Date: | Thursday, March 14, 2002, 23:57 |
At 5:44 PM -0500 03/14/02, John Cowan wrote:
>Dirk Elzinga scripsit:
>
>> In English, like the other Germanic languages, stress may fall on any
>> one of the final three syllables.
>
>Howzat? APoplexy, INtegrated, PSEUdocoding, MICrocomputer (as distinct
>from microPROCessor), anTIcipate, TERminator, KILopascals -- all drawn
>at random from one book.
I gather it wasn't a Danielle Steele novel; it certainly couldn't be
said to represent English vocabulary very well (not a single word in
the list is native, for example).
But that's not a fair reply. Here's a fairer one.
Your list can be divided into compounds and non-compounds. The compounds are:
PSEUdo-CODing
MICro-comPUTer
KILo-pasCALS
I consider all of these to be compounds, since they combine roots,
even if the roots are bound.
Now for the non-compounds. I have three sources which refer to a
class of stress-neutral or weak suffixes. Their chief property is
that they never draw stress rightward. Inflectional suffixes, -ed,
-ing, -y, and /-@r/ <-er,-ar,-or> belong to this group. All of the
noncompounds in your list have one of these weak suffixes.
This explanation preserves my generalization, but at a cost. Perhaps
it's too great a cost for an adequate description of English. But for
Aidan's purposes, I think that my generalization is good enough.
Dirk
--
Dirk Elzinga Dirk_Elzinga@byu.edu
Man deth swa he byth thonne he mot swa he wile.
'A man does as he is when he can do what he wants.'
- Old English Proverb
Reply