| From: | Eric Christopherson <rakko@...> |
|---|---|
| Date: | Saturday, February 17, 2007, 20:56 |
On Feb 17, 2007, at 2:47 AM, T. A. McLeay wrote:> There's also the concept of "vocoids" and "contoids" which allow for a > less circular definition, but I'm pretty sure [l, r\] (and all > approximants) are classified as "vocoids" in that system, yet they're > usually *not* nuclei.Out of curiosity, why "contoid" rather than *"consoid"?
| R A Brown <ray@...> |