Re: Future Spanish: update

Pablo escribi=F3:
>
> Here are the latest developments in Future Spanish
> (tentative name: _Ispan'ol_ [1hp@'n^ol]).
Is your future Spanish some kind of development in the whole Spanish
speaking world or just some future development from Argentina?

In the later case a more acurate name would be _Arzentin_ [@rs^@n^t^in] (=
I
got it right?)

Literature and television are playing in order to make Spanish one langua=
ge,
I wonder why are Rioplatence features like aspiration of syllabe final {s=
}
({-s} as [h]), and voseo will be winning on the general language... (in
Bogot=E1 is quite the opposite {s} are clear [s] in all positions except
before voiced consonants where it becomes [z], and is definitively a
_t=FA_/_usted_ dialect).

If the unity of Spanish is preserved, I would see few evolution, further
dialectical evolution but still being recognized as Spanish... writting
would not longer be phonemic but orthography reforms would be few in orde=
r
to preserve the common point in all the Spanish speaking world.  Rolo
(Bogotano) will never become a _vos_ dialect as Rioplatense won't become =
a
_t=FA_ dialect.

Or let's give the context in which Argentinans won't care to speak the sa=
me
language as Chileneans, Spaniards, Colombians and Mexicans.

-- Carlos Th