Re: "Language Creation" in your conlang

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:50:46 -0800, JS Bangs <jaspax@...>
wrote:

>So if you'd like to have your conlang included, just mail the list with a
>translation of the phrase "language creation", as a compound if possible,
>and I'll try to include it. I don't want to image to get over-busy, so I
>don't promise that I'll be able to include everything I receive, but I'll
>try to get most of them.
In Tirelat, which I'm trying to revive, "gavikuri u lhat" -- it would've
been "gavikuri a lhat" since "lhat" was "A" gender, but I'm going back to a
previous version of the language before I introduced gender. I suppose it
could be "lhategavikuri" as a single word compound, but Tirelat tends not
to have such long compounds. "Gavikuri" is derived:

gavi -ku  -ri
exist-CAUS-ACTION

Note that the "lh" in "lhat" should be written as a Polish slashed "l" if
possible.

In Lindiga, which has been undergoing some spelling reforms, the current
version is "verlás rsinkat" [vE`"lAs "s`INgAt].

verl  -ás       rsinka  -t
create-ACTIVITY language-GEN

--
languages of Azir------> ---<http://www.io.com/~hmiller/lang/index.html>---
hmiller (Herman Miller)   "If all Printers were determin'd not to print any
@io.com  email password: thing till they were sure it would offend no body,
\ "Subject: teamouse" /  there would be very little printed." -Ben Franklin