Theiling Online    Sitemap    Conlang Mailing List HQ   

Re: Intro to Frankish, was Re: A Franco-Turkic a posteriori language

From:Ray Brown <ray.brown@...>
Date:Thursday, January 13, 2005, 18:12
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005, at 11:03 , Doug Dee wrote:

> In a message dated 1/12/2005 3:43:53 PM Eastern Standard Time, > Rodlox@HOTMAIL.COM writes: > >> my historical geography's a mite rusty...weren't there a lot more Turks >> in/near Byzantium than there were in/near the Crusader states? > > Maybe, but I figure that if they succeeded in conquering Byzanitum, they' > d > eventually turn their attention southwards towards the Crusaders again.
Yes - one does have to remember that con-histories (or alt-histories) do not exactly mirror the history of our 'real' world :)
> Also note that in my conhistory, there will be no Fourth Crusade and sack > of > Constantinople to weak the Byzantines. > > So I'm assuming both the Byzantines and the Crusaders will weather the > Turkish storm.
A very different world, then - no Turkish occupation of the Balkans. That could have many implications for the subsequent history of Europe.
> >>> Therefore, there will be a Greek-speaking empire >> next door >>> to these Frankish-speakers, which might lead to more Greek influence >>> than I >>> initially planned on. > >> not neccessarily...the Byzantine Empire might undergo a third change >> (from >> Latin-speaking to Greek-speaking to Turk/Arabic-speaking). > > It could, but it doesn't seem likely to me under the circumstances. I > can't > think of an example of a sizable country adopting the language of hostile > neighbors who tried & failed to conquer it.
Indeed not. Also the Byzantine Empire was never Latin-*speaking*. It is true that until the 6th cent CE the surviving eastern Empire continued to use Latin as the official, administrative language. But it was not & never had been the _spoken_ language of the people living there. It was, I suppose, a bit like England after the Norman conquest when Norman French was for a few centuries the official, administrative language. But the spoken language of most remained English. If the English had taken up speaking the official, administrative language, I would be typing this in some modern descendant of Norman French ;) Between the 6th & 9th centuries, with the collapse of the western Empire & the separation of the Eastern & Western Churches, Latin became supplanted by Greek - the language of both Church and the common people - and the empire changed from late Roman to Byzantine. But it must be said the official language was still not the spoken language of the people - it was the Atticizing Greek of the late Hellenistic period - but it was now a good deal closer to the spoken language than Latin had ever been :) Ray =============================================== http://home.freeuk.com/ray.brown ray.brown@freeuk.com =============================================== Anything is possible in the fabulous Celtic twilight, which is not so much a twilight of the gods as of the reason." [JRRT, "English and Welsh" ]