Re: notelangs
From: | Tim May <butsuri@...> |
Date: | Wednesday, January 22, 2003, 18:36 |
Nokta Kanto writes:
> Cuneiform was scratched into
> wet clay, and celtic runes were carved into wood; both are composed of
> entirely straight lines for that reason.
Just to be precise - cuneiform was not, in general, *scratched* in wet
clay, but rather pressed. That's why they're wedge-shaped (cuneiform)
- the stylus had a wedge-shaped cross-section. It's because any kind
of scratching is difficult to do in wet clay that cuneiform scripts
were so popular. Wedge-shaped strokes aren't really very practical in
any other medium, which is why there aren't any cuneiform scripts
around now. (I'm sure this is an oversimplification, but I think it's
basically correct.)
Reply