Re: Revised Eastern Vowel Orthography
From: | Danny Wier <dawier@...> |
Date: | Sunday, May 23, 1999, 17:40 |
FFlores wrote:
>Also, /P/ and /f/ are not very distinct... more or less
>the same as with /h/ and /x/ (which someone once said that
>were found contrasting in any natlang).
I can't think of a single natlang example of phonemic distinction of /P/ and
/f/. The former isn't that common; it's found in languages like Japanese
and Uzbek, but the vast majority has the latter only. They are a little
distinct, if the ear is trained well, so it's theoretically possible to have
both...
However, contrast of /h/ and /x/ is more common. You have both phonemes in
Irish and Scots Gaelic, Welsh, Scots English, Dutch, German, Czech,
Ukrainian (the /h/ is voiced in that language), Arabic, Hebrew, Aramaic,
Somali, Azeri, Turkmen, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tatar-Bashkir, Uzbek (where /x/ is
uvular), Uyghur, Kalmyk-Oirat, Persian, Kurdish, Pashto, Urdu, Kashmiri,
Hmong and (I think) Vietnamese. Of course many languages have one but not
the other: English, Hungarian, Turkish, and Japanese only have /h/; Spanish,
Russian, Khalkha Mongolian and Mandarin Chinese only have /x/.
Danny
_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com