Re: Futurese

>I hadn't been following this thread, but I would like to butt in to
>point out that the reasoning from UPSID is bogus phonologically as
>well as (as observed by Ray) statistically.
O.K. it may be bogus, but that's the only thing we have
so far. And I took it just as a reference, not as a
bible. The phoneme chart of the proposal has its own
internal logic.

Cheers,
Javier