Re: ,Language' in language name?
From: | Nik Taylor <fortytwo@...> |
Date: | Thursday, November 29, 2001, 2:01 |
Muke Tever wrote:
> Well, true, in the sense that a suffix like "-ese" doesn't have anything to do
> with any _word_ at all. But it's like saying "language" and "speech" don't have
> anything to do with each other because the words aren't related. It seems
> like -ese (n.) *does* mean 'language' now, as in constructions like
> "bureaucratese" or "churchese".
At any rate, -ese is not a word, and the original question was about
language names containing the *word* for language. If the question is
about containing a morpheme for language, then most of my conlangs have
done that, but few, if any, have had an actual *word* for language in
the name.
--
"There's no such thing as 'cool'. Everyone's just a big dork or nerd,
you just have to find people who are dorky the same way you are." -
overheard
ICQ: 18656696
AIM Screen-Name: NikTaylor42