Re: ,Language' in language name?
From: | Barry Garcia <barry_garcia@...> |
Date: | Thursday, November 29, 2001, 1:16 |
CONLANG@LISTSERV.BROWN.EDU writes:
>Well, true, in the sense that a suffix like "-ese" doesn't have anything
>to do
>with any _word_ at all. But it's like saying "language" and "speech"
>don't have
>anything to do with each other because the words aren't related. It seems
>like -ese (n.) *does* mean 'language' now, as in constructions like
>"bureaucratese" or "churchese".
Or maybe more specifically, the meaning has been *extended* to mean
language. It still retains it's other functions: Japanese food, Japanese
clothing, Chinese food, Chinese laquerwear, Taiwanese ceramics, etc.
_______________________________________
"Peace is not healthy for war and other violent conflicts. We who can kick
the shit out of others must now bring the pain upon our enemies" - Me