Re: I Ching/ Yijing (was Re: musicalexemes (was Re: Interesting Words)
From: | William Annis <annis@...> |
Date: | Friday, November 9, 2001, 14:17 |
>From: J Y S Czhang <czhang23@...>
>
> One may even argue it is the very Cornerstone of all educated Chinese
>culture! (That everything else that came after it - the Tao Te
>Ching/Daodejing, The Art of War, etc. - is just elaborations based on the
>Oracle - the Book of Changes).
"All of Chinese thought is a footnote to the Yijing?" Hmm.
That doesn't quite work, isn't quite Chinese.
"All of Chinese thought is a neo-Confucian commentary on the
Yijing." That works better. :)
>> I even study a martial
>>art that uses the Yijing as an approach to fighting.
>
> Bagua, right?
Yep. Well, actually we're on Xingyi right now -- the two are
commonly taught together for entertaining historical reasons -- but we
do touch on Bagua from time to time in our Xingyi study. In about 9
mo. we start in on the Bagua fully. For Xingyi, we focus on the 5
phases, often called the 5 "elements," misleadingly, IMHO.
Different schools of Bagua emphasize the Yijing differently.
The one I study doesn't make a huge deal about it, Jiulong does, as I
understand. The biggest insight I've gotten out of it so far is the
realization that power doesn't reside in yin or yang, but in the
transition state between them.
I had started in on a nice martial arts vocabulary for Vaior,
but as my understanding of the arts changes, my vocab design changes.
I'll probably hold off for a while longer...
--
wm
Reply