From: | PMVA <pmva@...> |
---|---|
Date: | Wednesday, September 1, 2004, 19:27 |
Isaac A. Penzev ta nugatu-r:>> Could the distinction be a similar one to the Polish?> No. Polish has [s] ~ [s\] ~ [s`], that is alveolar vs. alveo-palatal vs. > retroflex (or, acc. to other sources, velarised postalveolar [S_G]).http://grzegorj.w.interia.pl/gram/uni/sibilants.html -- /\ P. M. Arktayg pmva[na]avenned.org /\ \/ "rubba s.idqin ka:na ?akd_aba min kid_bin" \/ \/\/ 'czêsto prawda jest bardziej k³amliwa ni¿ k³amstwo' \/\/