Re: Coptic/Cyrillic

Daniel A. Wier scripsit:

> But Unicode 3.0 might be adding the
> true Coptic character set, which is a unified case (as the second text
> example).
Nope, no Coptic/Greek deunification in 3.0, maybe 4.0.

> That might be a plane variant of Greek, like Fraktur and Gaeilge
> would be of Latin, so it might not have its own allocation area.
That's the way Coptic is treated now, as mostly a font difference.
Michael Everson's document is meant to demonstrate that that's a bad idea.

> My goal is to merge the three Greek-based alphabets into one, inshallah...
Greek, Coptic, Cyrillic?   Why not Latin, Georgian, Armenian too?

--
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
       I am a member of a civilization. --David Brin